In which scenario would a network grid design be most appropriate?

A network grid design is most appropriate in larger cities with multiple high-rise buildings due to the complexity and density of the infrastructure required to supply electricity effectively in such environments. In urban settings, the demand for electricity is high, and the distribution network must be able to manage various loads and provide reliable service to a large number of consumers. The network grid design allows for a decentralized approach, which can facilitate better reliability, redundancy, and overall efficiency in power distribution.

In this situation, the interconnected system of power lines and substations enables optimal load balancing and quick recovery from outages, which is essential in densely populated areas where power interruptions can significantly impact many users. Additionally, the design supports the integration of various energy sources, which can enhance resilience and sustainability within the urban power supply.

Other scenarios, such as rural areas with few buildings, may not justify the complexity of a network grid due to lower demand and the feasibility of simpler distribution methods. In developing areas with limited power sources, the focus might be on establishing basic infrastructure rather than a comprehensive network system. Coastal regions prone to hurricanes face unique challenges that might require specially designed systems for resilience against extreme weather, rather than a standard network grid that may not be suited to such specific environmental vulnerabilities.